Any Way You Slice It

I was just on Pinterest looking at tips for topical reading (that is, divination based on the general “fortune-telling” subjects of  love, money, work, health, etc), which I belatedly realized are just variations on the Lost Man Spread. A card is pre-selected as “Significator” to represent the topic of interest, but it is left in the deck. The deck is shuffled and then turned face-up, after which the cards are fanned out, keeping everything in the as-shuffled order, and the Significator is located. What is essentially a “vertical slice” of the deck is taken, in which the Significator and the two cards immediately adjacent to it are pulled out and laid down in a three-card line with the Significator in the middle, the bottom card to the left and the top card to the right. This doesn’t always have to be three cards; if more detail is desired, the two or three cards both below and above the Significator can be pulled, creating a five or seven card line. One potential “glitch” I recognized in this method is that the Significator might appear at the very beginning or end of the deck with no cards on one side or the other, in which case I would pull the card(s) at the opposite end of the deck to accompany it on the vacant side, once again keeping the original order. (Think of the “fan” as becoming a continuous circle.)

It seems more productive to me to read these lines as a pivotal focus card with modifiers than as a linear progression or time-line from left-to-right. One suggestion is to treat the flanking cards as challenges to the free expression of the Significator, essentially hemming it in. But I’m thinking it would be useful to view the card (or cards) to the left as showing challenges and the one (or ones) to the right as reflecting opportunities. The odd number of cards offers an ideal scenario for the use of Elemental Dignities, which could either strengthen or weaken the potency of the Significator according to the elemental “friendliness” of the modifiers.

The advantage I see in this approach is that it eliminates the complexities of the “deal” and of having to choose an appropriate spread. The Significator’s condition as defined by the nature of the modifiers is sufficient to determine the likelihood of it manifesting as expected. The outcome of the reading hinges on how clear a path the Significator has to realizing its potential. A poorly-favored Significator could be either a bad thing (a “good” card is undermined) or a good thing (a “bad” card is mitigated), although in the worst case the “bad” card’s influence would be exaggerated by unfortunate associations.

5 thoughts on “Any Way You Slice It

  1. I tend to do this. However I might adapt the flanking cards interpretation as I intuit. So maybe something within immediate focus, or influence. Or what one has to support them or overcome. I will cut the deck into the 4 worlds and search for the significator like this. Depending on position of significator in the pile indicates to me how much influence one may have within the scenario. Generally “how far into/along they are in this chapter/journey”

    Liked by 2 people

    • The “four packs” model also comes from the Opening of the Key method, in which the location of the Significator in one of the four elemental packs defines what the thrust of the rest of the reading will be. The idea was to “tell the Querent why he has come,” failing which would invalidate the reading. I don’t do that and just see it as a useful “pointer.”


      • I adapt my own methods, I have never been one of any tradition. Mish-mash and experiment with various aspects and elements that resonate with me and my self styled/named/made practice of “miscellaneous”.
        I like guidelines because it’s helpful to get perspective, but there is no single “hard line” or one way with anything I do/see/view/believe

        Liked by 2 people

  2. I’ve read that if the significator card ends up too close to the start or end of the deck to have the amount of flanking cards that you wanted then you need to restart the ritual and shuffling because you did something wrong. I think that is a pretty poor excuse for that situation happening and think that it’s more likely that this just isn’t the best way to see events surrounding the significator. A method I saw that I liked a lot better was to pull the significator out of the deck first, shuffle and (in this case as it was a 3×3 box spread) take out eight cards either from the fan or off the top of the deck. Then shuffle those 8 cards plus the significator and lay them out to see where the significator fell. I think that method could also work as a line by just adjusting the number of cards you pull out to shuffle with the significator. Depending on what position in the line they fall it could show how much is in their past or future.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s